Method & scientific basis

A scoring framework for irritation pressure, not a vague marketing adjective.

SSS was built to translate real formulation inputs into a clearer sensitivity signal. The positioning comes from the SSS pitch deck, while the scientific logic is grounded in published literature on skin pH, active tolerability, and topical delivery.

Score design

The 1-5 scale teams can actually use.

Try it in the dashboard

1

Ultra-safe

2

Low risk

3

Moderate

4

Elevated

5

High reactivity

Workflow

How SSS turns formulation data into a score.

  1. Step 1

    Identify tracked active ingredients and their percentages.

  2. Step 2

    Calculate relative irritation pressure against internal tolerance thresholds.

  3. Step 3

    Take the highest RIR as the primary ingredient stressor.

  4. Step 4

    Apply the pH penalty curve.

  5. Step 5

    Adjust for delivery format before mapping to the 1-5 SSS scale.

Scientific logic

Pillar A: pH stress

SSS treats pH as a barrier-context signal because the skin surface acid mantle helps regulate permeability, cohesion, and barrier performance.

Experimental and review literature show that shifts away from healthy acidic skin conditions can alter barrier homeostasis and irritation response.

Pillar B: concentration versus threshold

SSS converts the strongest active burden into a single RIR signal so the highest likely irritancy driver shapes the score instead of averaging everything away.

Topical retinoid and acid literature consistently shows that concentration, vehicle, and formulation context change tolerability.

Pillar C: delivery system

SSS weights delivery because exposure changes when an active is free, controlled, or encapsulated.

Controlled-release and encapsulation studies show delivery systems can materially change stability, release rate, and irritation burden.

API request

The request shape is intentionally small.

POST /api/score
{
  "pH": 3.7,
  "ingredients": [
    { "name": "Retinol", "percentage": 0.3 },
    { "name": "Niacinamide", "percentage": 5 }
  ],
  "delivery": "encapsulated",
  "customThresholds": {
    "Azelaic Acid": 10
  }
}

The threshold override object is optional. If omitted, SSS uses its standard internal coverage table for the ingredients listed below.

Access design

One email address maps to one reusable key.

The evaluation flow is intentionally controlled. Users request their key by email, receive the same credential on future requests, and use that key to unlock the scoring workspace.

Complimentary access is limited to one formula screen per key. The same key can then be upgraded into paid access without reissuing credentials.

Standard threshold coverage

These are the built-in SSS tolerance values available when a team chooses to use the system default table instead of custom thresholds.

Retinol0.2%
Glycolic Acid5%
Lactic Acid5%
Salicylic Acid2%
Vitamin C10%
Niacinamide10%
Benzoyl Peroxide2.5%

FAQ

What is SSS actually measuring?

SSS is a rules-based formula screening score. It estimates irritation pressure from three signals: pH stress, the strongest active burden, and delivery format.

Does SSS replace safety, patch, or clinical testing?

No. SSS is designed as a formulation-screening and communication layer, not as a replacement for formal safety, regulatory, or clinical programs.

Who is it for?

Founder-led beauty teams can use it to sharpen launch positioning, while enterprise groups can use it to compare products and align decisions across R&D, regulatory, and commercial teams.

Can the threshold table be customised?

Yes. SSS ships with a built-in threshold table for its standard covered ingredients, and the dashboard now allows optional custom threshold overrides when teams want to model a proprietary tolerance framework.

Source notes

The strategic framing on this page comes from the SSS pitch deck. The scientific claims below point to the external literature used to explain why pH, active burden, and delivery are reasonable screening inputs.